Talk:Andreas Illiger

Untitled

Oh for Christ's sake, not again. How is the developer of a number one selling iPhone app. possibly not noteworthy? - Bmju (talk) 11:31, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, but this just annoys me, every bleeping time I create a new page, I have to have an argument on the talk page with someone about whether it is noteworthy. By the way, I don't create many new pages, and (so far) it has been agreed that those which I have created were indeed noteworthy under Wikipedia's guidlines. Which is far from presupposing that I will 'win' this dispute, but just to try to indicate that I am editing the encyclopedia in good faith, and it seems to me a waste of my valuable (to me) time to have to have these arguments every time, but please feel free to explain to me what I should be doing differently in order to avoid this. But anyway, that aside, other than common sense (to me, but clearly not to the person who posted the speedy deletion tag) here is a specific Wikipedia guideline which I think that programming a 2 million selling, number one iPhone app. meets:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BIO#Creative_professionals

3. The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.

Specifically, Andreas Illiger has "created ... a significant or well-known work ... that has been the subject of ... multiple independent periodical articles or reviews".

- Bmju (talk) 11:31, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

OK, I have now edited the article; only slightly, but in a way which more clearly establishes independent notability without (for instance) assuming that the reader of the article already knows what 'Tiny Wings' is, as I guess I implicitly did before. - Bmju (talk) 12:14, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Andreas Illiger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110824125128/http://www.zdf.de:80/ZDFmediathek/beitrag/video/1346874/Der+Erfolg+von+Tiny+Wings to http://www.zdf.de/ZDFmediathek/beitrag/video/1346874/Der+Erfolg+von+Tiny+Wings

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:21, 13 October 2016 (UTC)