Talk:Andreas Malm

Latest comment: 7 days ago by Korollar in topic Gaza

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because it does not duplicate an existing English Wikipedia topic. Rather, it duplicates an existing draft which was moved to userspace on November 21, 2020 for being undersourced, and has received only one edit since then. This article, which I believe to be better-sourced than that draft and more suitable for publication as a stub, should be allowed to remain on Wikipedia as a stub; the contents of that draft can be merged in as is suitable or necessary. Please note that I'm not aware of (and haven't been able to find) the Wikipedia policy about an issue like this one, so let me know if I'm missing something or I should take a different course of action! -- warmly, ezlev. talk 04:59, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Additionally, in case I wasn't clear, I believe that this article does "expand upon, detail or improve information" as compared to the preexisting draft, and contains "referenced, mergeable material," and thus should not be eligible for deletion as per WP:A10. warmly, ezlev. talk 05:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Prime movers?

edit

RobbieIanMorrison, what are prime movers in the context of the paragraph you added? ezlevtlk
ctrbs
21:22, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ezlev: I just wikilinked that term. A "prime mover" is a general term for devices that convert heat to work in an industrial setting. So technologies like steam engines, stationary gas turbines, industrial diesel motors, and so forth. Hope that helps? RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 21:31, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
It does, thanks! ezlevtlk
ctrbs
22:09, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Criminal history?

edit

Andreas Malm has a background in the extreme left (syndicalism) and was convicted in 2010 of aggravated sabotage. In articles in Swedish media he has encouraged organisations like Extinction Rebellion and other climate activists to use violence. Shouldn’t this be included? 151.177.73.209 (talk) 18:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

151.177.73.209, do you have a source? ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 18:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Gaza

edit

Two of the three news papers cited as alleging that Malm welcomed the attacks of October 7 "with joy" are, I believe, quite right of the mainstream. In short, after a cursory search I couldn't find a major news organization having published anything corroborating these claims, at least not in English. In the tweet linked in the Jounral du Dimanche I couldn't hear Malm say anything about receiving the news "with joy" even though they do cite him as having said that. So, if at all, I'd prefer a phrasing along the lines that he is alleged to have said such an such. Also, crucially, I'd be much more comfortable with more reputable sources. --Korollar (talk) 14:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply