Talk:Andrei Kanchelskis

Latest comment: 6 years ago by El Badboy! in topic United Controversy

Old talk

edit

His card happens to be the rarest of the 1994 World Cup Contenders set by Upper Deck.

edit
 

This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it. Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 05:17, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

United Controversy

edit

Does anyone else believe that more should be made of the way in which he left United? I also believe that the scale of impact that he had at United hasn't been highlighted enough. Kanchelskis was an awesome player in his pomp and from the article it indicates he was more successful at Everton than United. Siralexf 15:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)siralexfReply

The article claims that Kancheskis and SAF fell out and "he was promptly transfer-listed". This assertion cites no sources and I feel it requires substantiation given that it runs contrary to all the extant information about this notorious transfer, and it is a matter of record that SAF did not wish Kanchelskis to leave, nor did the player himself. It rather looks like an attempt to sanitise was was certainly perceived as, let me say, a problematic, to say the least, transfer. Tarquin Q. Zanzibar (talk) 05:38, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Andrei Kanchelskis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Andrei Kanchelskis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:47, 5 July 2017 (UTC)Reply