Talk:Andrei Năstase
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Community Tech bot in topic A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | This article contains a translation of Andrei Năstase from ro.wikipedia. |
Template messages
editI have added three cleanup templates to the article regarding its factual accuracy and neutrality. My brief motivation for them:
- Partisan sources - I have just cleaned the article and removed many sources that were highly partisan (and also known for non-factual reporting), but it nonetheless still has quite some. Examples are websites affiliated with political parties (mainly PDM, but not only) or politicians such as deschide.md, jurnaltv.md, democracy.md, sputnik.md, ziarulnational.md.
- Undue weight - probably the most important out of the three for this article. Controversies (especially the relations with the Țopa family) are very much highlighted and make up most of the article (as they are everywhere, not only in the controversies section), while factual non-judgmental reporting of political activity, political views, etc. is barely mentioned. The article needs to be enriched with more non-biased information about the politician.
- Unbalanced - the article is very biased towards a negative view of the politician. For any of his actions, opposing opinions are presented, but his responses or the perspectives of those that support him are never mentioned.
--NetPresentValue (talk) 13:28, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- In order to keep the balance of the informatiom placed, the independent and reliable sources have been removed. It relates to the information regarding the relations with Țopa's, statements made by LP's leader Dorin Chirtoacă. As long as one aspect of the life of a personality ( in case of a political life of Andrei Năstase) is less reflected and it progressed not by removing the information about the other aspects of the life.
--Stefan Marin (talk) 09:28, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- I am not sure I fully understand what you are saying. I kept all sources, including the ones from biased sources, except when they were redundant (when there was more than one source for the same statement). One source is enough to cite one statement. The other thing I did was remove bias as much as I could, strive for higher objectivity by removing loaded words such as "oligarch", and adopt a more balanced tone by nuancing certain statements. For more info, see WP:NPOV.--NetPresentValue (talk) 01:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:07, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)