Talk:Andrew Chan (drug smuggler)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Andrew Chan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 10:43, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: four found, three repaired and one tagged.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 10:48, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The article is reasonably well written. Complies sufficiently with MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Ref #2[2] is attributed to The Daily Telegraph (Australia).

   ref #38[3] is a broken link, just directs to the current front page of the website.

   There is no citation for the subject's date of birth.

   Other sources appear to be RS.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   There are major problems here. This fails on the criteria of broadness of coverage of the subject. Apart from an un-cited date of birth and mention of Enfield and his employment everything here is about one event, the drug smuggling. Loooking at the other nominated articles most of them contain essentially the same story, told in the same words. A biographical article about a person should cover their life story. This is about one incident, so it fails on this.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   The content of the article is essentially re-written tabloid journalism, it doesn't maintain an encyclopaedic tone.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Appears stable.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   The image used claims to be fair use because it is it is a historically significant photo of famous individuals; and Its inclusion in the article adds significantly to the article because it shows the subject of this article and how the event depicted was very historically significant to the general public. Neither of these are correct - it is a photograph of two men on a balcony. This is neither historically significant nor are the individuals famous, they are convicted felons.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   For the reasons mentioned above I am failing this nomination. The issues are so fundamental that they cannot be resolved by mere editing. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:08, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Untitled

Question about Andrew: Does anyone know if Andrew Chan ever used the name Jimmy Chan in the past? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.189.217.40 (talk) 01:42, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Occupation

See also: Talk:Myuran Sukumaran § Occupation

Let's try and resolve this once and for all, rather than having ongoing edit wars. In the infobox, should Chan's occupation be listed as drug trafficker, pastor or none? WWGB (talk) 06:55, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

His most recent career choice us probably the most relevant. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 07:11, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

You cannot have a career in prison. A job is an "a regular activity performed for payment, that occupies one's time". You can't do that in prison so his occupation and/or occupational choices were on hiatus. The options are as follows:-

1) He didn't have a career

2) He was a supervisor for a catering company

3) He was a drug smuggler. Bear in mind he did at least two successful trips before the failed one, and probably earned far :::more than he did working for the catering company.5.67.167.35 (talk) 13:25, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

@ IP : Keep discussing the question here rather than asserting your opinion in the article. Since we are probably unlikely to reach a consensus on an "occupation" or "profession" I suggest that we don't include one but just let the body of the article clarify these matters. Afterwriting (talk) 14:23, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

My view is, if it's going to be ANY then it can't be paster, that's all. He started being a paster in Prison, and you can't have an occupation while in prison. But not having 'occupation' at all may be more appropriate.5.67.167.35 (talk) 20:10, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Andrew Chan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.news.com.au/story/0%2C10117%2C18129672-29277%2C00.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-stories/2015/01/07/clemency-denied-for-bali-nine-member.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150205153727/http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-stories/2015/02/05/chan--sukumaran-plead-for-lives.html to http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-stories/2015/02/05/chan--sukumaran-plead-for-lives.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:40, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Andrew Chan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120612050923/http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/top-stories/bali-nine-ringleader-loses-last-appeal/story-e6frg12l-1226077259035 to http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/top-stories/bali-nine-ringleader-loses-last-appeal/story-e6frg12l-1226077259035

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 17 September 2017 (UTC)