Talk:Andrew Jaspan
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Evolution and evolvability in topic References
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
POV
editI'ved marked this as POV. Apart from the introduction para, it seems to be focussing on negative aspects of Jaspan. I doubt he has no positive aspects. —Felix the Cassowary ɑe hɪː jɐ 07:45, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
Those negative aspects are not untrue though. Just because not as many pro Jaspan things have been written as anti Jaspan, does that make it POV even if they are all true? Xtra 07:53, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
- No, but as it currently stands it looks like an attempt to insult Jaspan. I don’t know anything about him other than that he edits The Age, and that some people don’t like him and have insulted him. I come here to find out more about him, and I've found out that he edits The Age, and some editors have done what appears to be a less-subtle form of insulting him. Anyway, normally people aren't downright cruel; they have a background and this can change the light of what they've said and done. This needs to be covered. —Felix the Cassowary ɑe hɪː jɐ 10:16, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
- I made some changes to address PoV issues. I'd like to take the PoV warning down, unless there are objections.FRS 15:57, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- Looks excellent to me. I'll remove the POV tag now, but I won't mind at all if anyone reverts it. Ambi 01:49, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
References
editI've converted the article's external links to references where appropriate. I've managed to track down additional refs for most of the statements in the article, but there's still quite a bit missing. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 01:48, 30 June 2021 (UTC)