Talk:Andrew Loog Oldham

Name?

I've known of ALO since the formation of the Stones and he was always known to us as ALO or just Andy Oldham - I am puzzled by the note "This British surname is barrelled, being made up of multiple names. It should be written as Loog Oldham, not Oldham." Since when? I have read both volumes of his autobiography and I don't recall any instance of his being referred to by a third person as Loog Oldham. I am well aware that the Loog is from his father whom he never knew: but unless that is is preference, it does not make his name barreled. Was this a unilateral decision by some editor? Cross Reference (talk) 05:05, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

I'll own up to making the name consistent throughout the article as Loog Oldham, based on the hatnote which says it should be written as Loog Oldham, not Oldham. That hatnote was added on 1 September 2022 by User:CitizenKang414. Perhaps they could explain, or add a citation? The article's online references do indeed say Oldham. I haven't seen the books referenced. Masato.harada (talk) 14:51, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

I have amended the text to show Oldham throughout, with an explanatory note. Masato.harada (talk) 07:52, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

If his parents were married – which is not made clear either way in the article – it strikes me as extremely unlikely that he was brought up without his father's surname. What does his autobiography say on that subject? Also, what did contemporary printed sources (the 1960s music press) say?

Moreover, is it not possible that some (at least) sources acknowledge his surname is "Loog Oldham" yet refer to him as "Oldham" in order to save space?

Just some thoughts. Harfarhs (talk) 16:31, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Pet Sounds advert myth

I've removed the reference to Oldham's taking out adverts to publicise said Beach Boys album, as it's not true. Someone involved with the production of the 1995 Brian Wilson documentary "I Just Wasn't Made For These Times" searched the UK rock press of 1966-67 and failed to find any such thing.86.13.147.181 (talk) 11:21, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Stonedcoverdig.jpg

Image:Stonedcoverdig.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Interview, profile piece suggestion

Interview and profile from 1966 with NME. (Full disclosure: I am an editor at Crawdaddy!, where this was recently republished. But, to abide with COI guidelines, I am not posting anything on the wikipage itself, just letting editors know about the source.) Rolling Stone Oldham: Talented, Insulting, Outrageous Thanks for your time
Asst. Editor, Crawdaddy! FenderRhodesScholar | Talk 18:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Pronunciation

Perhaps someone can add the correct pronunciation for Loog, seeing as we are dealing with an Englishman and a Dutch name. Varlaam (talk) 05:26, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Forgive this "discussing the subject", but it might prove useful to the article: For English speakers (of all stripe, or stars-and-stripe), would it be reasonably accurate to give his name as sounding like "Andrew Rhymes-with-'rogue' Old-'em"? 2601:545:8201:AB7A:9889:3EE4:C75F:EEA8 (talk) 20:43, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

In the sixties I knew people who had known him a year or two earlier and we, Stones fans all, pronounced it to rhyme with coug as in cougar.Cross Reference (talk) 01:03, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

It's fair to assume that it would rhyme with Moog', and here's the man himself to confirm he likes the sound 'owg' as in the first syllable of 'ogre':

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDN-y0QQ7cs Recidivist23 (talk) 08:00, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

please clarify some things

His father was killed in 1943 but I am seeing Feb. 1944 for formation of Eighth Air Force (see its article); presumably a predecessor to Eighth Air Force was already in operation.

Where was he born? In addition to Eighth Air Force being mentioned, it's mentioned that his mother was Australian. (Oops, the background-information inset does mention London, but how did that come about given what I saw about his parents?)

I am seeing his father's surname as Loog and his mother's maiden name as Oldham. So what happened to cause this man to be become known as Andrew Loog Oldham?

OK, there is the note about this man encouraging Jagger and Richards to write their own songs, but it is also noted that in 1963, Oldham had the "s" removed from Richards' surname. (Richards would restore that trailing "s" in the 1970s.) See Richards' Wikipedia entry.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Andrew Loog Oldham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081217170357/http://www.losratonesweb.com.ar:80/ to http://www.losratonesweb.com.ar

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:42, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Andrew Loog Oldham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120205003455/http://www.bside-rock.com/The-Rolling-Stones-Songbook.html to http://www.bside-rock.com/The-Rolling-Stones-Songbook.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:03, 13 October 2016 (UTC)