| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
Untitled
editIs there a good reason to quote Lyne so extensively? Also, is it possible to get some reaction from his fellow physicists to his famous "3d possibility" announcement? (As I heard the story, he offered 3 possibilities: a new planet, an anomaly in the data, or a mistake...) Wasn't that around the same time Pons & Fleishman were doing "20/20"? Also, it should be noted Lyne has discovered more pulsars than any other scientist. Trekphiler 03:53, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
I was present in person at Lyne's retraction talk at the AAS meeting, and I can confirm the ovation as one who participated in it, but that's unadmissible as COS here and I am unaware of a good reference. BSVulturis (talk) 16:28, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
More stuff on fr:
editAdded many stuff on fr: page, for those who would be interested. Alain r 13:32, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
It is completely irresponsible that, in this short page on Lyne, the goof gets so much billing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.29.77.101 (talk) 13:51, 2 July 2008 (UTC)