Talk:Andrew Myrick
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Edit
editI am editing the article. It states the same thing under two headings. I'm going to combine them. --Connor K. 01:15, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
he said "shit" not "dung"
editI put in the citation and own this book.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Andrew Myrick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060719155543/http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/dakota/dakota.html to http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/dakota/dakota.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:52, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Mary Todd Lincoln and the Dakota Conflict?
editI removed the following statement:
- Payments to the Dakota Indians had not been made, partly because of delays caused by the American Civil War and possibly because Mary Todd Lincoln had over spent decorating and cleaning the Executive mansion.[clarification needed][citation needed] She spent the entire four year budget allocated by Congress in a matter of months[according to whom?] and she tried to cover it up; when Lincoln found out he was livid and immediately dispatched Congress to quietly approve two appropriations to pay her bills,[clarification needed] and the money had to come from somewhere.[clarification needed][1] [Bold mine that was removed]
Sorry, but this doesn't pass the smell test... I've read a lot of books on this subject and never heard of Mary Todd Lincoln's involvement with overspending the result of the Dakota War. Better come up with a better source to make this claim... Dinkytown talk 05:33, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete this article
editThere does not seem to be enough content to justify an "Andrew Myrick" biography article. Yes, he may have been a catalyst to the Dakota War, but he did not really cause it. He was just a spark to much larger issues that the Dakota were protesting by going to war. There is too little information about him to give him an article. His importance is overblown, even if his remarks became famous. Everything significant about him can be folded into the Dakota War. Parkwells (talk) 16:56, 7 November 2018 (UTC)