Talk:Andrew Ross (rugby union, born 1879)
Andrew Ross (rugby union, born 1879) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 30, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Andrew Ross (rugby union, born 1879) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Andrew Ross (rugby union, born 1879) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 April 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Andrew Ross (rugby union)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Wugapodes (talk · contribs) 14:44, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Will review. Wugapodes [thɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 14:44, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Checklist
editGA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- See WP:PEACOCK
- A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused (see summary style):
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- See WP:PEACOCK
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
editIf the comment is numbered, it must be addressed for the article to pass, if it is bulleted, it's an optional suggestion or comment that you don't need to act on right now.
When I quote things, you can use ctrl+f to search the page for the specific line I quoted.
- "He had an adventurous life..." too editorialized. Reword to be more neutral and encyclopedic
- Done. FunkyCanute (talk) 09:55, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- The block quote on his death reads as rather non-neutral since it contains almost entirely praise which doesn't add much information.
- Removed. FunkyCanute (talk) 09:55, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- You might want to wikilink "solicitor" in the lead. I don't know what it is, and solicitor is a dab page.
- I have linked to Solicitor (not a dab page).
- The Action at St Eloi Craters section seems to be almost entirely quotes. I would recommend rewriting it to use original prose. See WP:OVERQUOTE.
- After removing the quote from the CO, the balance, I think, is restored.
Results
editOn Hold for 7 days. Very close! Just a few more edits. Wugapodes [thɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 19:55, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- I think that's everything cleared up. Many thanks for the review, Wugapodes. FunkyCanute (talk) 09:57, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Promoted Very good work! Wugapodes [thɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 01:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Andrew Ross (rugby player) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 08:35, 6 October 2020 (UTC)