 | This article was nominated for deletion on 1 July 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Christian Fundamentalist?
editI think that many Fundamentalists would think it's pretty amusing that Sandlin would be categorized a "Christian fundamentalist". A "Reformed catholic", an ex-Reconstructionist, a postmodernist, an ecumenist, a post-millenialist and ... a Christian fundamentalist? Truly all things to all men!
Seriously, there are better labels to apply to this man. "Christian fundamentalist" sounds like some kind of left-handed jab. — Mark (Mkmcconn) ** 00:45, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
00:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)00:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)00:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)00:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)00:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)00:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)00:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)66.121.137.90 00:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
Get to know the man!
editMy recommendation to anyone reading this about Andrew, and having questions about him, is to first take time to read his blogs and writings, not just some simplified and wholy inadequate precîs. Secondly, I would recommend calling him and getting to know him. Andrew is very forthcoming and eagerly explains his positions and thinking with clarity and grace. His understanding of and commitment to Sola Scriptura is unequivocal. 66.121.137.90 00:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC) Don Broesamle -- broesamle@earthlink.net
Good article on Calvinism
editSandlin also wrote one of the best things I've seen on Calvinism:
Tone
editThis article, while short, is unusually hagiographic and reads more like a CV than an encyclopedia article. The first sentence especially is tediously long. The first sentence of a WP article should establish what the subject is notable for, not a list of everything done. Is anyone acquainted enough with Sandlin to identify his key notability? Ashmoo (talk) 09:36, 26 November 2018 (UTC)