Talk:Andrew Schulz
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Semi-protected edit request on 7 June 2017
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Website: thehezzy
I need to add the following website to his page along side his other url. Source: request of Andrew Schultz. Gnarjar (talk) 01:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Not done: per WP:ELMINOFFICIAL — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:07, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Personal Information
editThere is a lot of personal information re: parents, relatives, etc that I cannot sources for within the given references. Anyone else? Maineartists (talk) 23:05, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:52, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Woke controversy
editWho wrote this section? Not only is it terribly written and grammatically lacking in structure and comprehension; it really has no notable reason for inclusion. It does not follow through with what is being claimed; and the link to the Financial Times is personal opinion and cannot be backed. Not only that, this sentence: "Schulz opened with a monologue blaming the initial, global spread of COVID-19 on China which, according to the Financial Times, it does", doesn't even make sense. Furthermore, bringing up bits from his Special on trivial comments ("sexual innuendo"?) about Woody Allen and Soon-Yi is just ridiculous considering the source isn't strong enough for notable mention in a WP article. They were merely Twitter comments that both praised and condemned the special equally. Big deal. The section is poorly written and should be scrubbed. Maineartists (talk) 22:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Page Protection
editIn light of the excessive edits by a recent unregistered user which are not only unsourced but disruptive; I've asked for a temporary semi-protection of this page: [1]. Maineartists (talk) 14:08, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Missing words in first graph
editThe second sentence is just a list with no verbs: MTV2's Guy Code (and its two spinoffs),[1] the Flagrant 2 podcast,[2] andThe Brilliant Idiots podcast.[3] Perhaps someone with knowledge of his work would specify his role. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Galutnik (talk • contribs) 18:25, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- It looks like there was some vandalism a few times during in the last month, which was removed, but the original part of that sentence wasn't restored. I've done so now. Thanks for catching that. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:27, 15 February 2022 (UTC)