Talk:Andrew Stahl (artist)

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Otr500 in topic Article issues

Needs cleanup.

edit

Needs copy edit and wikifying. GeorgeLouis (talk) 07:45, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Andrew Stahl (artist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:12, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Article issues

edit
Advice that the article "Needs copy edit and wikifying" was given in 2011 ( See: "Needs cleanup" above) and there are still unresolved issues.
  • Sources: The article uses primary sources that are incomplete at best and vague, lacking actual links that can be used for verification: All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material. and key wording is often overlooked or is likely to be challenged. Page numbers are missing which means there is no text–source integrity . This would be where Not in citation and Missing page tags would be appropriate.
The subject is reportedly a Professor of Fine Art and Head of Undergraduate Painting. The last certainly gives a presumption of notability per WP:PROF but Wikipedia policies and guidelines are not vague that sourcing is required for verification. WP:SOURCESEXIST arguments are seldom effective and the often used WP:NEXIST includes If it is likely that significant coverage in independent sources can be found for a topic, deletion due to lack of notability is inappropriate. However, once an article's notability has been challenged, merely asserting that unspecified sources exist is seldom persuasive, especially if time passes and actual proof does not surface, as Wikipedia, nor editors, claim to have a crystal ball. `` Otr500 (talk) 08:46, 30 May 2020 (UTC)Reply