Talk:Andriamasinavalona

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Khazar2 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Andriamasinavalona/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 02:09, 28 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'll be glad to take this one--thanks as always for your great contributions. Initial comments to follow in the next 1-3 days, depending on how the baseball World Series is progressing... -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:09, 28 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

This looks excellent; the only work left to be done is an image that needs proper tagging. Thanks again for all your work on this! -- Khazar2 (talk) 09:12, 28 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Thanks for reviewing this, Khazar! I've added the copyright tags on the images and made a couple of other fixes. Let me know if you find anything else that needs my attention.
Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
  1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
  1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
  2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
  2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
  2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
  3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
  3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. [:File:Ambohidratrimo Madagascar 1901 view from east.jpg]] needs tag for US copyright status (since that's where WMF servers are)
  6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
  7. Overall assessment. Pass as GA