Talk:Andy Rakic

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Das osmnezz in topic Andy Rakic
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Andy Rakic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:58, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Andy Rakic

edit

I found [1] (which goes heavily into his background), [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], and [11], among many many more sources. On top of that, he is a clear topic of interest and definitely has offline sources having clearly been significant figure in Australian league football with extensive career including abroad in fully pro Croatian top flight and Germany in 1990s-2010s. Wikipedia is supposed to be a source of knowledge, and this article is a "yes" to Wikipedia:The one question. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Regarding most of the consistent pro-deletion users, I dont understand why they spend all their effort deleting other peoples honest hard work instead of improving them, especially most pro-deletion users I have encountered who have a double standard where they either support Wikipedia:SNG where the article doesn't need to meet WP:GNG or have sometimes created articles of people with less coverage than this one. (I support article creation, but many pro-deletion users double standard is very frustrating). Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 03:06, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply