Talk:Anemone coronaria

Untitled

Question: Can that photograph be any larger in the article? Perhaps 450px wide or even remove all of the words and display the image at full size so that there is nothing but that image there, perhaps a photographer biography, including how much the science of botany is important to the photographer, etc. A review of the photograph by the photographer of how this is the best image available to illustrate this particular article at English wikipedia.</sarcasm> -- carol (talk) 02:16, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anemone coronaria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bsbi.org.uk/BSBIList2007.xls
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711073328/http://www.gardenersworld.com/plant-detail/PL000000/48/poppy-anemone to http://www.gardenersworld.com/plant-detail/PL000000/48/poppy-anemone

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:27, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Replaced first ref with correct link --Michael Goodyear (talk) 18:19, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Replaced second ref with correct link --Michael Goodyear (talk) 18:19, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Proof that wild forms are not always red?

I would like to have definitive citations that show that the plant comes in colors other than red in its true wild species type. Just because people may have planted some of the hybrids in the wild doesn't mean those colors are truly the wild form. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.216.159.194 (talk) 20:39, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

As someone who have seen and taken pictures of purple, pink and white wild anemones, I can confirm they also come in colors other than red. If you need a source form site, see כלנית מצויה and this [1]. פרצטמול (talk) 05:45, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

I'm not sure how you would show definitively that non-red forms seen in the wild haven't been influenced by the development of various colours in horticulture. It's clearly the case that various colour forms are found outside cultivation, which is probably the best that can be said. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)