Talk:Aneurysm
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Aneurysm.
|
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Aneurysm definition
editThe currently listed definition is misleading and incorrect. The current definition on the main page is "a localized, abnormal, weak spot on a blood vessel wall that causes an outward bulging, likened to a bubble or balloon."
First of all, the cited reference does not contain this definition. The definition in the cited source is "a balloon-like bulge in an artery." This is a more appropriate definition, as explained below.
The word aneurysm does not refer to a "weak spot" but rather to the ballooning/bulging caused by a weak spot. Indeed, the bulging is often caused by a weakened portion of a blood vessel wall; however, the word aneurysm refers to the bulging, not to the weakened spot. Therefore, for clarity, the definition should be rearranged to something more akin to: "an outward bulging of a blood vessel, likened to a bubble or balloon, caused by a localized, abnormal, weak portion of a blood vessel wall."
Aneurism/Aneurysm
editNo one else seems to have brought this us, but yes the odd -ysm spelling is more common now but hasn't always been. Apparently, the spellings switched between 1880 and 1940. Anyone have a source as to why?
Also, will just leave these here for those with historical interest like me
- , Encyclopædia Britannica, 9th ed., Vol. II, New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1878, p. 26.
- , Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed., Vol. II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1911, p. 4.
even though most people coming to the article itself probably want the most up-to-date information without any distraction from earlier and now outdated understandings. — LlywelynII 15:28, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Standstill Procedure
editWhy is this not included in the article?
"Vein attack" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Vein attack. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 6#Vein attack until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:05, 6 April 2021 (UTC)