Talk:Angela Brazil

Copyright violation

The text on this page was a copy of [1] and [2], so I cut it. Gdr 19:02, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Was the Charles Hamilton article put under such a microscope - when still a WiP - I think not. Skull 'n' Femurs 15:50, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Biographical

Details re-written, with the above cited in References section. Skull 'n' Femurs 15:09, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Charles Hamilton

I have taken this following paragraph out of the summary for now. It gives perhaps undue emphasis to Hamilton, and may be misleading in regards to Brazil's significance as a children's writer, as Brazil has been commented on in her own right for achievements in establishing tropes and themes, and reflecting social changes parallel with her writing, in girl's school stories without reference to the schoolboy equivalent. If it appears relevant in commentary written from further referenced research, it can of course be returned to the article, but perhaps would in any case belong to a section on the historical context of children's school literature.

"The equivalent in respect of boys' stories was Charles Hamilton (1876-1961), (pen name Frank Richards). This twentieth century genre aimed to write entertaining rather than merely instructional stories. L. T. Meade (1854-1914) was a hugely prolific author of School Girls' Stories in the second half of the nineteenth century, but in the much more overtly moralizing, instructional, style."

Work by Anonymous Editor

I am seriously inclined to revert most of the editing done by IP 90.209.236.38 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Angela_Brazil&diff=307135132&oldid=300023461

Some of this may well be legitimate (but no evidence whatsoever is offered as to why), the trouble with the editor's actions is that the article is carefully anchored in published academic commentary. It is possible the Anonymous editor might be correct in their assertion Angela Brazil was not as innovative as the article suggested (I disagree from my research however), but that cannot justify removing properly sourced claims just because you disagree with them without prior discussion.

I will not revert at this stage, I feel it is more helpful to give some time for this issue to be discussed in talk, as it should have been originally prior to these changes. Mesmacat (talk) 03:13, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

The name Lesbia

The writer's choice of this name is probably influenced not so much by Sappho as by Catullus, the Roman poet who addressed lots of poems to a girl of the same name, but actually dedicated them to a girl called Clodia (which has the same metric value), who was already married to someone else. Nuttyskin (talk) 18:06, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Interpretations of lesbian content section

Actually, Romantic friendship was quite common for the time period, and not viewed as being lesbian or not normal or anything like that. Viewed through modern eyes, there certainly are homosexual overtones, but to state it wasn't normal for that time period isn't accurate. dyknowsore (talk) 07:21, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Angela Brazil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130923235144/http://www3.shropshire-cc.gov.uk/people/brazil.htm to http://www3.shropshire-cc.gov.uk/people/brazil.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130923235144/http://www3.shropshire-cc.gov.uk/people/brazil.htm to http://www3.shropshire-cc.gov.uk/people/brazil.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:48, 13 October 2016 (UTC)