Talk:Anglican Episcopal Church

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Low-importance).

Talk:Personal Ordinariate

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Apart from the Traditional Anglican Communion, the article should really consider verifying whether groups within the Anglican Episcopal Church have ever sought a similar canonical structure to the proposed personal ordinariates. ADM (talk) 18:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possible misspelling, bad link

The article twice refers to ConnEr, no first name. This person is possibly Bishop George ConnOr.

The link to the subject of the article goes to a page of Japanese characters which discusses boys and girls. That web site is probably unrelated to the denomination which is the topic of this Wikipedia article.

Assessment comment

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Anglican Episcopal Church/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Needs photos, lead section, and more details. Maybe an info box. -- SECisek 18:14, 29 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 18:14, 29 September 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 07:49, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Add topic