Talk:Anglo-Saxon law

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anglo-Saxon law article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms Top‑importance

	Anglo-Saxon England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

1911 Encyclopædia Britannica

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I went through the article and added footnotes to any texts that could be traced to the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica article. Most of the article seems to have been copied straight from the EB article, but there are a couple of sections that appear to be entirely original research. I am not a fan of the language used in the EB article; it seems needlessly abstract. However, at least now readers and editors can identify where most of the information comes from. Ltwin (talk) 02:47, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic