Conflict of interest (COI) editing involves contributing to Wikipedia about yourself, family, friends, clients, employers, or your financial and other relationships.
Any external relationship can trigger a conflict of interest.
Editors with a COI, including paid editors, are expected to disclose it whenever they seek to change an affected article's content.
This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed.
Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject Psychology as it illustrates the power of using the third party technique to attain credibility for social influence and how sustained use of public relations and propaganda techniques can change opinions. Propaganda is a subcategory of Persuasion, which in turn is a subcategory of Social Psychology.
This article is of interest to WikiProject Medicine as dog attacks, especially from pit bulls, are a major source of pediatric trauma. In addition, the National Canine Research Center’s studies imply that medical professionals are not being able to correctly identify a dog’s breed in an attack, implying their studies are not valid and can be dismissed. They further argue that breed is irrelevant to aggression and should not even be reported, e.g., the CDC has been influenced by the AVMA to no longer report breeds involved in dog attacks.
The article is of interest to WikiProject Science and WikiProject Skepticism as it illustrates how a well-funded, non-partisan advocacy group can use public relations to effectively sway public opinion away from a consensus scientific opinion and thus undercut the credibility of legitimate scientific studies performed by medical doctors and instead contribute to a politicization of science.
Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Hi, There is lots of harv errors on this page. Many are actually bibliography entries that are referenced from citations. They should have bibliography section. The further reading sections shouldn't be any citation at all. Great article.
Latest comment: 7 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Currently the section headings are very different from most articles on organisation, there's no history section and heading are all over the place. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
WP:MOS doesn't dictate articles to be identical to others. There is nothing here that violates MOS:SECTIONHEAD.
However, you are most welcome to add a History section. I don't have much more than what is in the lede and in the rest of the article so maybe you can contribute more info for such a section.
They don't have to be identical but as I said on the NCRC page the article reads more like an essay. Putting them under a controversy and criticism section would help with that. There's also sections that are unnecessary like one that is just a single paragraph on Malbouef's description of the pit bull lobby. Traumnovelle (talk) 00:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
