There were many issues with this article including:
- Use of multiple local papers covering the same story to create impression of more sources
- Use of very emotive language
- Information of campaigns that lack any notability - this article should not be a history of every action taken by a small animal rights group
- Discussion of use of FOI to "unveil" information that appears (and has done for a long time) freely on institutional websites. Further investigations suggests most of the these FOI requests were answered as links back to the respective websites.
- Broken links
I've tried to address this issue and slim this down into an article that respects the notability criteria and addresses key actions by the AJP.
London prophet (talk) 14:40, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply