Talk:Animal Protection Party
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Animal Protection Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091214195011/http://www.animalprotectionparty.com:80/index.php?id=5 to http://www.animalprotectionparty.com/index.php?id=5
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100507100439/http://www.animalprotectionparty.com:80/index.php?id=2 to http://www.animalprotectionparty.com/index.php?id=2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Notability
editTwo previous deletion discussions failed to properly address notability requirements. Both arguments consisted of asserting the party was notable because it had stood candidates and a Google News search was pointed to, but no actual coverage was found. There's none only one local news piece in the article. The relevant guideline is Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies), which notes there is no "inherent notability" - meaning existing and standing in elections is not sufficient. In short, the requirement is to find multiple examples of detailed coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the party. Fences&Windows 10:21, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- Update: they were deregistered in November. Holliman is still running a charity called The Animal Protection and Woodland Organisation, with charity shops in Kent.[1] Fences&Windows 11:09, 15 April 2017 (UTC)