Talk:Aniracetam

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Danski14 in topic Approved for what?

this article seems to imply that Japanese are not "healthy, unimpaired humans."

(reply to above) I've heard about studies in Japan and came to this page hoping to find a summary/info on this. please add links/summaries in the main article or here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.249.114.142 (talk) 05:46, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Weird intro

edit

What is the meaning of the third clause of this sentence?

It has been tested in animals extensively, Alzheimer's patients, and temporarily impaired healthy subjects.

It's gramatically vague and also there is no citation for the implication that it "impairs healthy subjects."

I'm pretty close to removing the last part, unless someone has some support as to why it should stay, and if it were to stay, clearer phrasing is needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.183.100.70 (talk) 15:11, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

I believe means that it improved cognition in healthy subjects that were temporarily impaired. There are papers concerning a scopolamine model in the literature, but I'm not sure which one this sentence is referring to. Ohnodoctor (talk) 04:51, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Approved for what?

edit

Is aniracetam approved anywhere for anything? The article says "prescription only" in Australia, but what is it prescribed for? Danski14(talk) 19:50, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply