Talk:Anjan Dutt discography
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Titodutta in topic Sudden merge
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anjan Dutt discography redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Sudden merge
edit@Jackmcbarn: Why did you suddenly merge this article? I can not see any AFD or merge discussion. --Tito☸Dutta 22:41, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- The other article didn't really contain anything worth keeping split, so I boldly merged it. Also, it was originally created by a sockpuppet blocked for abusing AfC to create articles. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:43, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- Actually I thought to AFD it before, but, why did not you propose a "merge"? Why did not you ask a second opinion? And more importantly, why didn't you mention these in edit summary? --Tito☸Dutta 23:18, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- It didn't seem like it would be controversial. You (or anyone else) can revert me if it is. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:24, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- @Jackmcbarn: just few days ago, I read this article, it'll give you hints about the subject's notability. Anyway, I am not going to revert at least. I also thought to AFD it. But, consider clarifying things in edit summary and/or an AFD is a much better option here, since you get many editor's opinion there. --Tito☸Dutta 23:38, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- One of Wikipedia's "things" is that if you expect something to be uncontroversial, don't bother with the process, just do it, and if it turns out it was controversial, it will get undone and then the process can happen. I don't think I've acted improperly in any way. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:41, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- @Jackmcbarn: Really? Please request a third opinion (any editor or admin who participated in the last discussion).
--Tito☸Dutta 23:49, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- @Jackmcbarn: Really? Please request a third opinion (any editor or admin who participated in the last discussion).
- One of Wikipedia's "things" is that if you expect something to be uncontroversial, don't bother with the process, just do it, and if it turns out it was controversial, it will get undone and then the process can happen. I don't think I've acted improperly in any way. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:41, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Actually the disagreement was over whether you should have followed procedure or at least mention reason of the merge in the edit summary. --Tito☸Dutta 00:32, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, I've improved it. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:44, 3 September 2013 (UTC)