Talk:Anjunabeats discography
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anjunabeats discography redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Objection to page removal
edit@Makhamakhi:Hello. As it can be seen, this is a relatively new page, made with the purpose to reduce the article size of the original Anjunabeats article. As previously mentioned on the main article, the reason why this page exists was because the release section was very large & took a massive amount of time to scroll through in the original article. The choice to spilt was approved by another experienced editor as seen here, based on WP:SPLIT guidelines which were followed closely for this splitting. I don't see how this page is non-notable as releases are very well covered by sources online (Billboard, Your EDM), while Anjunabeats is a relatively known label. References are plenty, but I understand this page lacks them for now so I put up a "More Citations Needed" template with the intention to see future ref additions. I also don't see how is it not organised, as the page is separated into 3 simple categories: singles, albums, & compilations. Nothing more, nothing less, so I doubt your ability to relate to standard discography pages. Please link to a suggested existing main article too, should it be called Anjunabeats, not Arjunabeats. Thank you. aNode (discuss) 09:49, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Split for singles based on year released
edit@Lazz R: Heyo! Was just wondering, would it be advisable to split the tracks into the singles table, based on their year released? (2000, 2001, 2002 etc.) I still feel that the table is too large even though it's split under 2000-2009 and 2010-present, plus it's difficult to edit the table as one would have to scroll all the way up. Having every single year separated might be an eye-sore though, in the contents table at the top of the page since there will be too many numbers visible. aNode (discuss) 05:25, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- Oh jeez. I think this entire list needs an overhaul... Agreed, I'll try it out and see what works. I'll get to work then! Lazz_R 14:30, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- Can't imagine the time needed to totally overhaul the whole table, gosh... I guess the Original/Extended mixes column isn't really necessary, and it could use more citations! Anything you have in mind I'm happy to assist :) aNode (discuss) 15:05, 15 April 2018 (UTC)