Talk:Ann Washington Craton
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Rollinginhisgrave in topic GA Review
Ann Washington Craton was nominated as a History good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (August 15, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Ann Washington Craton/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Delabrede (talk · contribs) 18:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Rollinginhisgrave (talk · contribs) 11:11, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
I will be quickfailing this article. A few issues:
- There are multiple (two) citation needed tags currently on the article that have been there for over a month.
- The writings section is very long, doesn't establish the notability of the articles being summarized, uses idiomatic language "Craton describes the cold shoulder that the American Federation of Labor...", and consists of extremely long blockquotes. They're not COPYVIO, since they're quite old, but they're quite far from summary style. The last text is 220 words of blockquote.
- The infobox immediately contradicts the first sentence of the lede: died in 1901 vs 1891. It also expands on unsourced information that is not in the article, that she died in Rockville, Maryland.
- The article does not taken a neutral POV, and reads as hagiographic.
Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 11:11, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.