References

edit

Hello MountSnake87,

I dropped by this draft after reading your post at WP:Teahouse. I would like to offer some advice or guidance regarding references.

  1. Your references are currently all in URL format. Most articles use the {{Cite web}} template or a more specific template.
  2. As you already have the URL references you can use the reFill tool to automatically upgrade the references to templates: https://refill.toolforge.org/ Instructions are here: Wikipedia:reFill
  3. You can also automatically add archived links for when the URLs break, using the Internet Archive Bot (IABot) here: https://iabot.toolforge.org/index.php
  4. Edit: You can also use this tool to clean up and expand citation templates in a page: https://citations.toolforge.org/

I hope this helps, Rjjiii (talk) 07:42, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Comments left by AFC reviewers prior to acceptance

edit
  •   Comment: I am unsure of Anna Kernahan's personal notability. As presented I feel it to be borderline, but the role of a reviewer is defined as acceptance of drafts which we believe have a better than 50% chance of surviving an immediate deletion process. I cannot decide as presented here whether the topic or the person is notable. Thus I see it as my duty to Wikipedia to accept it, and allow others to make that judgement. I will remain neutral, as is my custom, if a borderline acceptance of mine is challenged 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 18:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply