Talk:Anne Locke

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Sonnet clarifications?

edit
Wyatt

Currently, the article states:

"Both Locke and Wyatt composed one sonnet per line of the psalm, except for verses 1 and 4, which are each glossed with two poems."

This seems wrong on a couple of levels: 1) Wyatt's versification of Psalm 51 (Miserere mei domine, "Rue on me lord...") is in terza rima (27 tercets plus concluding line), not sonnets; according to Harrier (the edition I have to hand) these are disposed thus: Verse 1 = 9 lines, V2=6, V3=3, V4=11, V5=6, V6=8, V7=4, V8=4, V9=2, V10=2, V11=2, V12=2, V13=3, V14=1, V15=6, V16=5, V17=3, V18=3, V19=3 (as you see, they don't match up evenly with tercets). So it is certainly true that Wyatt's versifications of lines 1 and 4 are -- like Locke's -- his longest. But unless I'm very confused, the current description is not right.

  • NB: it turns out that 1 & 4 are the longest verses of Psalm 51, so their extended treatment is "by the book". In fact in some translations these Psalm verses are actually represented by 2 pairs of parallel lines, as opposed to the other verses which are represented by 1 pair, or 1 triplet (though I'm a little fuzzy on just what texts Wyatt & Locke might have had in front of them). Phil wink (talk) 04:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Surrey

Is there a reason that the discussion of how Locke settled on her rime scheme seems to disregard Tottel's Miscellany? While she could not have brought it with her to Geneva (it was published in England just after she arrived), I see no reason she couldn't have gotten a hold of a copy between 1557 and 1560. There are several representatives of her rime scheme on its first dozen or so pages. Phil wink (talk) 23:57, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anne Locke. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC)Reply