A fact from Annie Nicolette Zadoks-Josephus Jitta appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 October 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Classical Committee, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Classical Committee articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's Classical CommitteeWikipedia:WikiProject Women's Classical CommitteeTemplate:WikiProject Women's Classical CommitteeWomen's Classical Committee articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
Hi Joe Roe, I tagged the section because it lacks inline citations. There is no way of readers knowing the information is verifiable, unless there is an inline citation to back it up. Or at least that's my understanding of things. Any thoughts? Thanks! MX (✉ • ✎) 14:45, 6 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
@MX: I have never encountered the idea that lists of works need inline citations – what would you cite, exactly? Readers can verify that these works exist and were written by Zadoks Josephus Jitta by consulting the works themselves, and sufficient bibliographic information to do that is already given, without the need for a footnote. – Joe (talk) 14:51, 6 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
Joe Roe: I did something like this for an article I wrote a long time ago. Yesterday's FA had a similiar section that looked like this. That is what I mean by inline citation – that readers can just click from Wikipedia to verify, instead of having to go elsewhere online to start their search. Not sure if it is possible in this article, as the works are somewhat old and may not be readily available online. MX (✉ • ✎) 15:07, 6 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
That seems to me to be simply a point of style: you moved the full citation to a footnote, this article has all the bibliographic information inline. Personally I don't see any reason to put it in a footnote, and I think the latter is the more common way of formatting bibliographies in biographies of academics. But regardless, footnotes or no footnotes – it doesn't change whether something is WP:Verifiable. I do think you would struggle to find online versions of most of these works. And again, using online or offline sources doesn't change whether something is verifiable; see WP:OFFLINE. – Joe (talk) 15:16, 6 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
