Talk:Annihilation: Conquest

Article title

Shouldn't it be Annihilation: Conquest (currently a redirect to Annihilation (comics))? That seems to be the name on the books themselves, to judge by the solicitations. --Mrph 18:00, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:ANNCON001 cvr.jpg

Image:ANNCON001 cvr.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:10, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

End of the article

Um, it mentions something about Xemnu and events regarding Quasar and Adam Warlock...but those events haven't happened yet...have they? Shouldn't we take that out until the actual issue is released? Unless there's pages in Quasar number 4 that I didn't get, that stuff wasn't in there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DNMN (talk • contribs) 05:34, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Spoiler Tag?

Jeez, man. Put some warning in there. Just because some of us know doesn't mean everyone else does, or more importantly, wants to know.
--Crimsondude 19:06, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Encyclopedias dont not restrict content just because people don't know. That is actually counter-productive, encyclopedias are unbiased sources of information. Rau J16 20:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)