Talk:Annunciation to the shepherds

Shepherds

While the article notes that shepherds were not of high standing in first-century Palestine, it stops there. In light of the many,many scriptural (and especially New Testament) references to sheep, and their overall positive connotations (think about calling people "sheep" today), this is a significant choice: the lambs come to the Lamb, etc. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 14:52, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

We can't put unsourced speculation in the article. While what you say makes sense to me personally, I haven't been able to find any books interpreting the passage that way. -- Radagast3 (talk) 22:53, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Angels sing?

In the section "Translational issues," this article states that, "The King James Version of the Bible translates the hymn of the angels...." Wikipedia correctly defines a hymn as a song. But nowhere in the Bible do I read that angels sing (or that angels have wings, either).

I suggest that the cited sentence be revised to read: "The King James Version of the Bible translates the words of the angels...." Discussion? --Kentmoraga (talk) 17:07, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Good idea. Johnbod (talk) 18:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

What time of year do shepherds keep watch over their flock?

I've always heard this said by people saying that the Nativity did not happen at winter. Most use it as a rhetorical question as if to be followed by "Everyone knows shepherds do that in March". Does anyone know when shepherds were keeping watch over their flock in first century Palestine, and what significance that has to the Nativity? I would think if you were a shepherd you'd keep watch over your flock all damn year. --Bellerophon5685 (talk) 20:34, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

In Palestine 2000 years ago, with wolves around, yes you would. Johnbod (talk) 20:46, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Annunciation to the shepherds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725183923/http://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript.aspx?dir=next&folioNo=6&lid=en&quireNo=77&side=r&zoomSlider=0 to http://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript.aspx?dir=next&folioNo=6&lid=en&quireNo=77&side=r&zoomSlider=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:22, 15 October 2016 (UTC)