Talk:Anoplognathus pallidicollis
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge proposal
editThe article begins by focussing on the species, but then provides what reads like a general description of Christmas beetles. For this reason I suggest merge or rewrite to pertain tot he specific. Heds (talk) 02:24, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
- It looks to me like the author is merely being a little careless. It is stated (elsewhere) that "Christmas beetle" most commonly refers to this species alone, so all the text here about "Christmas beetles" may well be species-specific. --Stemonitis (talk) 06:42, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- I see what you mean on re-reading. I'll have a go at tightening. Thanks, Heds (talk) 01:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anoplognathus pallidicollis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070708162851/http://members.forestry.crc.org.au/refs/ref10919.htm to http://members.forestry.crc.org.au/refs/ref10919.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)