Talk:Anostoma
![]() | A fact from Anostoma appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 February 2009, and was viewed approximately 2,037 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Anostoma brunneum
editA note on something that needs doing:
- Anostoma brunneum Verdcourt, 1991[1] - (verify the reference and whether it is a valid species. This species is not listed for example in Salgado & Coelcho, 2003).
- ^ VERDCOURT B. 1992. A NEW ANOSTOMA FROM BRAZIL (GASTROPODA, PULMONATA, BULIMULIDAE). JOURNAL OF CONCHOLOGY 34: 81-82.
The publication is listed on the website:
The species is listed on the website:
--Snek01 (talk) 16:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC), and Invertzoo (talk) 21:18, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anostoma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111004085748/http://www.biologia.ucr.ac.cr/rbt/attachments/suppls/sup51-3%20malacol/10-CAMPOS_42.pdf to http://www.biologia.ucr.ac.cr/rbt/attachments/suppls/sup51-3%20malacol/10-CAMPOS_42.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:45, 6 July 2017 (UTC)