Talk:Another Link in the Chain Tour
(Redirected from Talk:Another Link In The Chain Tour)
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Ilikedietcola in topic About the notability tag
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
About the notability tag
edit@Ilikedietcola and Crunchydillpickle: I'm not seeing evidence that the subject meets the concert tour notability guideline. Only The Daily Telegraph looks reliable, the other two citations are either primary or self-published sources, and so don't count towards an assessment of notability. Let me know what you think. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:50, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- I have a few references readily available to indicate notability, two of which are from Rolling Stone. Over the next few days, I intend on touching up this article with some additional content and sources. Dobbyelf62 (talk) 13:19, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Dobbyelf62: I'd appreciate if you did that! Could you provide links to the sources you're talking about? I'd like to take a quick look at them. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:47, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Sure. I'll start incorporating a few of them into the article now. Dobbyelf62 (talk) 18:31, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Dobbyelf62: I'd appreciate if you did that! Could you provide links to the sources you're talking about? I'd like to take a quick look at them. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:47, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, @TechnoSquirrel69, I remember being on the fence about accepting and I'm fairly new to AfC reviews so I trust your judgement more than my own. If Dobbyelf62 isn't able to find more more sources, I'm down to delete it. Sorry about that! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 22:35, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Good news: I was successful in finding more sources, so let me know if this is sufficient. If not, I might be able to dredge up a few more sources to further improve the article. Dobbyelf62 (talk) 00:09, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- No need to apologize, Crunchydillpickle — we're all learning here! I think it's great that you're willing to accept some drafts that are in a borderline area; as you can see, it helps get more eyes on the article, which hopefully results in a more polished product through collaboration. Dobbyelf62, thanks a lot for your work so far! The sources you've added are definitely an improvement. I just want to note for information that interviews, as primary sources, can't be considered when demonstrating the subject's notability. However, between the Daily Telegraph article and the Definitive History book, I think that's just enough to pass the general notability guideline in this case. I'm going to go ahead and remove the {{Notability}} tag and mark the article as reviewed. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks so much for all your work on this - really appreciate your expertise and it's great to see the page expand. Ilikedietcola (talk) 19:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Good news: I was successful in finding more sources, so let me know if this is sufficient. If not, I might be able to dredge up a few more sources to further improve the article. Dobbyelf62 (talk) 00:09, 2 January 2024 (UTC)