Talk:Anthony Joshua vs. Otto Wallin

Latest comment: 11 months ago by Robertsky in topic Requested move 13 December 2023

Requested move 13 December 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 02:36, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply


Anthony Joshua vs Otto WallinDay of Reckoning (boxing event) – Anthony Joshua vs Otto Wallin and Deontay Wilder vs Joseph Parker are both the main event. Therefore the title is misleading. I'd also accept Anthony Joshua vs Otto Wallin & Deontay Wilder vs Joseph Parker as a title, but it's a bit long. 134.219.227.22 (talk) 20:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Do not move it. Having the title as Anthony Joshua vs Otto Wallin makes perfect sense since that is the main event. Similar to KSI vs Tommy Fury where they marketed the bout as a "double main event" but in reality, Paul vs Danis was the co-main. Wilder vs Parker is the co-main thats marketed as a main event. GhaziTwaissi (talk) 16:45, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
This guy is genuinely comparing a shitty fake boxing match between two awful fighters to world-class fighters. 😂 You must know how seriously bad that event was. Anyway, there is no genuine main event on this card. 134.219.227.22 (talk) 20:44, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
First thing, regardless of the individuals of the event the event is still a ligament boxing match page on Wiki. Personal bias shouldn't be involved. Secondly, after second thought and with a different example provided in the history notes, I agree that the page should be moved to Day of Reckoning (boxing match) as there is no clear "main event" bout seeing as thats how its being marketed. GhaziTwaissi (talk) 21:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.