Talk:Anti-Terrorism Act (Canada)

Canada: Law Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

←

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article needs to be updated to include Bill C-51 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.189.206.33 (talk) 04:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Maybe merge it with Anti-terrorism_Act,_2015? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aganon77 (talk • contribs) 04:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

I disagree with the idea of merging the two articles. They are two very distinct pieces of legislation. Although the law has passed, the new government has promised to revisit it, and there is hope the 2015 version will be repealed. On the other hand, it would be extremely helpful to help differentiate the two by renaming the "Canadian Anti-Terrorism Act" page to "Anti-terrorism Act, 2001" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurelrusswurm (talk • contribs) 20:39, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

I also oppose merging the articles on the two Acts. They deal with the same general issue, but they were passed 14 years apart. As well neither one is asrand-alone Act. They each amend or enact other laws. I think it would be confusing to lump them together. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 12:40, 15 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disagree because it is a very notable topic in Canada and definitely merits its own article. NikolaiHo^☎️ 00:54, 15 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disagree: Both of these articles are noteworthy in their own way. The Anti-terrorism Act, 2015 was in response to the 2014 Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu ramming attack and the 2014 shootings at Parliament Hill, Ottawa, not 9/11. Both of these articles should link to each other but should remain separate. -- Kndimov (talk) 21:30, 15 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Canadian Anti-Terrorism Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Canadian Anti-Terrorism Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic