This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights articles
A fact from Anti-Vivisection Coalition appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 February 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Neither the NIBSC demo, not the Senate house demo appear to be notable enough to warrant a mention. There are thousands of demonstrations of 50 people on issues every day, there was nothing special about these. London prophet (talk) 10:55, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
We have multiple news stories about the group and it has been mentioned in Nature. There are plenty of other mentions in the news. This peer-reviewed article also mentions the group. I think it's pretty clear that they are notable. J Milburn (talk) 11:44, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
I'm not talking about removing the article, I'm talking about the two demonstrations mentioned in the 3rd and 5th paragraph - they are not notable. I mean AVC have held many demonstrations - why are these ones mentioned. A line simply saying they have organized X demonstrations would suffice. The only news covering these is local - and local news will cover many non-events not notable enough for Wiki.London prophet (talk) 17:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Sorry for misunderstanding; that is reasonable. I would have no objection to these sections being trimmed; perhaps a mention could remain as an example of the kind of protests the group organise. J Milburn (talk) 17:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
