Talk:Antics (album)

Untitled

• Who wrote this? Mordant? Seriously, this is either copyvio from a music review or someone tryng really hard to imitate the pompous stylings of a music reviewer. It reads like a review, so ulness some source can be cited, much of needs to go because it's little better than some music fan's opinion.--Hraefen ^Talk 20:57, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>

• All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen ^Talk 21:05, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

• It's NARC, not Narc..

--83.68.92.222 17:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Antics features Opendisc technology that claims to offer "Exclusive video, audio and more" but is in fact a form of DRM designed to stop CD ripping and unauthorised distribution. Despite these measures Antics can still be found on all major peer-to-peer filesharing systems.

i have this cd "open disc" clams not to be a form of DRM - which i believe it is not and the CD is easily ripped to mp3 on any computer

Fair use rationale for Image:Interpol antics 600x600 alt.jpg

Image:Interpol antics 600x600 alt.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:52, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

weird comparisons

"[..]reminiscent of The Chameleons." Who said that? Is that a fact? Plus, they're not even close to being reminiscent to The Chameleons, they got their absolutely own guitar patterns and style. These comparisons are pointless (more so when they are totally wrong) and quite weird to read on an encyclopedia. RonDivine (talk) 11:08, 19 September 2008 (UTC)