 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Footnotes
editAltho this pg was flagged w/ "{{nofootnotes}}" (="This article or section includes a list of references or a list of external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks in-text citations."), Wikipedia:Citing sources#How to cite sources states that:
- 'Articles can be supported with references in two ways: the provision of general references – books or other sources that support a significant amount of the material in the article – and inline citations, that is, references within the text, which provide source information for specific statements. Inline citations are needed for statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, including contentious material about living persons, and for all quotations.'
Now really, I doubt that there is anything controversial or likely to be challenged in this article that needs fact-by-fact referencing, so general references should suffice here.PBarak 03:36, 11 September 2007 (UTC)