Talk:Antipater (1st-century BC physician)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Diptanshu Das in topic Second century or first century

(1st century BC physician) to (1st-century BC physician)

edit

Would there be any objection to moving this article to Antipater (1st-century BC physician)? Since 1st and century are working together as a compound adjective before the noun physician, it should be hyphenated. Antipater (1st century BC physician) would remain as a redirect to the new title. If there's a consensus, or at least no objection, I'll make the move in about a week. Thank you. SchreiberBike (talk) 05:33, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Second century or first century

edit

Not sure if Antipater (1st-century BC physician) and Antipater (2nd-century physician) are distinct entities. Distinction sought with appropriate references. Diptanshu 💬 14:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC)Reply