Talk:Antisemitism in Turkey

Untitled

Article Antisemitism in Turkey is English translation of the original Russian wiki-article. The author of the Russian wiki-article is Pessimist2006.-- Jim Fitzgerald ^post 18:16, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

no references & wrong info

Hi, there some wrong info in this article, it says that the tax taken especially from Jews was agreed in parliament in which right-wing party was dominant. At that time there was only one party in Turkey, that being CHP, Ataturk's party. Also in this statement and in a lot of important statements, there are no references.--Utkun (talk) 02:36, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Neveshalomistanbul.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Neveshalomistanbul.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:07, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

RfC

BAn RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 16:24, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:3D Test of Antisemitism which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:32, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Antisemitism in Turkey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111116194428/http://www.tau.ac.il/Anti-Semitism/asw2007/turkey.html to http://www.tau.ac.il/Anti-Semitism/asw2007/turkey.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604092537/http://www.tau.ac.il/Anti-Semitism/asw2005/turkey.htm to http://www.tau.ac.il/Anti-Semitism/asw2005/turkey.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629112209/http://www.tau.ac.il/Anti-Semitism/asw2004/turkey.htm to http://www.tau.ac.il/Anti-Semitism/asw2004/turkey.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.foxnews.com/story/0%2C2933%2C103157%2C00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:34, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Slander

This article recklessly starts with references of Jews committing "blood libel" against their fellow citizens in Turkey, unsubstantiated and unbelievable. It does NOT say they were ACCUSED, but implies that because some -probably antisemitic- people accused them, they MUST have done these horrific things. Like the Salem WITCH HUNTS, innocent people were quite possibly SLANDERED for being DIFFERENT and were condemned unjustly. READ IT. Several times it is stated here AS FACT. NOT "ALLEGED" to have kidnapped and murdered people; this obviously SLOPPY IRRESPONSIBLE writer has left the idea that Jews are kidnappers and that they commit " blood libel" against their neighbors! CLEARLY IRRESPONSIBLE AND ANTISEMITIC, it sounds like a page right out of HITLER'S playbook. GET IT RIGHT & ERASE THIS GARBAGE. 12.71.33.162 (talk) 15:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Possible Misunderstanding by User 12.71.33.162

It seems this user doesn't know what "blood libel" or just the word "libel" means, or simply made the comment above hastily as can be seen clearly in the phrase "Jews committing 'blood libel' against their fellow citizens in Turkey" ;-) "Blood libel" is a slander committed against Jews (surely not by Jews, unless they're insane ;-), by making false claims of Jews abducting and sacrificing Christian (non-Jewish) children in some religious rituals. So, "blood libel" cases are facts, but the claims made in such cases are fiction. Veritas.vos.Liberabit.58 (talk) 10:08, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Valid source for execution claim

Hello, Wikipedians!

I am looking for any valid source for the claim about the decree of the execution of the Jews under the rule of Murad III The paragraph in the article. "However, later the attitude of the authorities towards the Jews deteriorated. In 1579 Sultan Murad III reportedly heard that Jewish women wore silk clothes decorated with precious stones, and ordered the destruction of all Jews in the Empire. Even though the decree was lifted, thanks to Shlomo Ashkenazi, the adviser to the Grand Vizier, a special clothing was ordered for Jews to wear. In particular, women were forbidden to wear silk, and men have been prescribed to wear a special form of hat." I am wondering what is the source from which this allegation sprang up. There are, of course, many resources that mention it; however, I want to access to the imperial decree or any kind of paper -from older times- that will confirm the claim. I looked it up in the added sources but could not find any reliable source. Besides, the term "reportedly" makes it harder to be sure of the claim. Thanks in advance! BitikciKebbenek (talk) 09:43, 17 October 2022 (UTC)