Talk:Antonin Raymond

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Antonin Raymond/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments:

• "After the war, Raymond's practice with Tuttle, Seelye and Place dissolved and he went into business with another Czech architect, Ladislav Leland Rado (1909-1993), Raymond & L. L. Rado" - The last two parts are a bit confusing. Did they set up two companies? It needs a bit more clarity.

I have helped copy edit the article, mainly for punctuation issues and MoS compliance. The only thing left is the clarification for the sentence above. I will place this On Hold in the meantime.

Thanks for your time reviewing this article. I have amended the problem sentence and I hope this helps to clarify things! Kenchikuben (talk) 19:48, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification. I am now satisfied that the article meets all the criteria for a Good Article, and I am happy to pass it. Well done! -- S Masters (talk) 04:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Saint Paul Chapel of Rikkyo Gakuin.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Saint Paul Chapel of Rikkyo Gakuin.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Saint Paul Chapel of Rikkyo Gakuin.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:29, 1 March 2012 (UTC)