This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is part of WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the Eastern Orthodox Church. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You may also want to look at the current collaboration of the month or the project's notice board.Eastern OrthodoxyWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyTemplate:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyEastern Orthodoxy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
That's not a significant difference in frequency. Antony not only more closely reflects the Russian spelling, it also more closely reflects the Latin original of the name. Anthony is a Renaissance-era English spelling based on a misunderstanding of the name's etymology. Angr (talk) 19:02, 14 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
The sources I used to write the article all call him "Antony". Just because slightly more people misspell the name than spell it correctly is not a reason for us to misspell it too. Angr (talk) 16:34, 15 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The following sentence: In this position he suppressed the Eastern Catholics of Ukraine as well as nationalism within the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. is entirely wrong.
First of all, the Eastern Catholic church in the Russian Empire was entirely liquidated in 1875 when the last Eastern Catholic diocese, the Kholm diocese, under the pressure of Tsarist officials was incorporated to the Russian Orthodox Church as part of Warsaw Orthodox eparchy. Therefore, when Antony (Khrapovitsky) arrived in Volhynia there were no Eastern Catholics he might surpress. What is true is that the archbishop worked actively on promoting Orthodoxy in Austrian Galizia, sending missionaries there to have the Galizian Eastern Catholics converted to Russian Orthodoxy.
Antony (Khrapovitsky) was not able to fight nationalism in Ukrainian Orthodox Church for there was nothing like the named Church while he was archbishop in Zhytomyr. The Orthodox structures in the region belonged to Russian Orthodox Church. It should be stated instead that Antony was a Russian nationalist who actively participated in the efforts of russification of the local Ukrainian-speaking population. The article says nothing about Antony's participation in the extreme right Black Hundreds, not about the transformation of the Pochaiv Lavra into a large russification centre, to which he greatly contributed. 86.111.101.252 (talk) 11:20, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
