Talk:Anu Muhammad

Latest comment: 21 days ago by Worldbruce in topic Non-neutral point of view

Notability

edit

There is no clear evidence of notability. I did some searching. There are a few news mentions about Anu Muhammad commenting on how he got beaten up while protesting, but that is not notable. Other than that, I couldn't find any sources that would indicate notability. Some of the claims in the article can't be verified. For example, I couldn't find his name on the Faculty page of his university. --CronopioFlotante (talk) 21:10, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Anu Muhammad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:59, 16 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Non-neutral point of view

edit

The October 2024 edits of মাহতাব উদ্দীন আহমেদ have shifted this article away from independent sources and introduced an advertising tone and strong point of view based on the website of the subject and publications of organizations he works for, which have a vested interest in promoting him. Opinions like, "Muhammad stands against class-gender-ethnic-religious discrimination, exploitation, environmental destruction, colonial domination, neo-liberal aggression in Bangladesh and elsewhere" may not be stated in Wikipedia's voice and should not be sourced to him. Such language would be acceptable only if sourced to independent source and attributed inline. Similarly, citing non-independent sources to support the dates he was involved with an organization and his job title is fine, but what he accomplished there needs independent sources. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply