This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Maintenance tags
editCan someone of those who are removing the {{autobiography}}, {{refimprove}} templates please explain the reason for it. The autobiography tag was added because the article is written in non-neutral language by an editor having a similar username as the subject. And per the Verifiability policy of Wikipedia that requires the information added in articles must be verifiable in the form of an inline citation to a Reliable Source, the second tag was added. But both of these were removed persistently by some IP editors and Munir hussain1, so I do like to hear your view about this. -- SMS Talk 10:03, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Content issue
edit@Pak research: Discuss the issue here instead of reversions and calling up unspecified Wikipedia policies. samee converse 14:59, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Dear Samee, please read the body of article, and see that the claimed title does not match the content given in the body of the article, so it is against BLP policy as not being a verifiable content. IHC has nowhere ruled anywhere this assertion claimed in this unknown webpost. Thank you. 27.^ "Lawmakers deliberately amended Khatam-e-Nabuwwat clause to benefit Ahmadis, rules IHC". Daily Pakistan Global. Retrieved 30 July 2018.
Dear Samee, please see the article printed in The News on this issue: " https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/341416-khatam-e-nabuwwat-declaration-ihc-hasn-t-held-anyone-responsible-for-amendment. Thank you