Talk:Anyang

VfD discussion (2004)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

This is a VfD discussion about AnYang, which now redirects here.

The article entitled "AnYang" is a duplicate of the article called "Anyang." "AnYang" is listed as orphaned. Since Anyang contains the same info, why not just delete "AnYang"? P0M 01:23, 17 May 2004 (UTC)

• is a redirect now. -- Chris 73 | Talk 04:09, 17 May 2004 (UTC)
• Keep redir. Niteowlneils 17:22, 20 May 2004 (UTC)
• Keep the redirect. --Starx 00:34, 22 May 2004 (UTC)
• Keep redirect. PMC 21:29, 22 May 2004 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Location

Whats the latitude and longitude of Anyang? Elijahmeeks 22:53, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Requested move (2007)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Anyang → Anyang, Henan — There must be a disambigation page for Anyang, Henan and Anyang, Gyeonggi in South Korea 70.131.218.93 22:42, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Survey

Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.

Survey - in support of the move

Survey - in opposition to the move

1. Weak oppose Why "must there"? Looks like primary usage to me. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 16:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

1. Oppose Just note the other Anyang(s) at the head of this article. I would think that most people looking for Anyang are doing so because of Yin and the Shang Dynasty in China. Elijahmeeks 16:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Discussion

Add any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. --Stemonitis 08:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Photos

the photo for this page and for the anyang in south korea are identical. one of them is the wrong photo, and i think it is the chinese one that is out of place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.111.121.41 (talk • contribs) 02:52, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Requested move 21 August 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. The consensus is that the Chinese city is the primary topic. Jenks24 (talk) 10:20, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

---

Anyang → Anyang, Henan – Anyang, Gyeonggi is also notable too. Kanghuitari (talk) 03:47, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

• Comment: This Anyang seems to have more than eight times the population of the other one. No one will dispute that the other one is notable – the only question is whether this Anyang is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for "Anyang" or not. 5.2 million versus 0.6 million is a big difference. London, Kentucky, and Paris, Texas, are notable too, but the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for London and Paris are cities in Europe. —BarrelProof (talk) 04:31, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

But, Anyang is 15th largest city in South Korea. population.. yeah, I know. but most Chinese cities have a lot of population. See List of cities in China by population. China is originally "Huge" population country. -- Kanghuitari (talk) 08:35, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Is 15th largest supposed to be meaningful? South Korea is not a large country, and 15 isn't even in the top 5. -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 04:37, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

• Strong oppose WP:RECENTISM/WP:PRIMARYTOPIC This is a former Capital of China, it is not merely a suburb of a capital as the on in Gyeonggi is of Seoul (South Korean capital). There is a lot of scholarship concerning this location, due to its centrality for hundreds of years of history in East Asia. -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 04:43, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
• Strong Oppose per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. As pointed out above, Anyang, Henan is a much bigger city than Anyang, Gyeonggi. It is also far more important historically as the earliest archaeologically proven ancient capital in China (and East Asia). -Zanhe (talk) 18:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

• Oppose per others above. A good analogy (I know, OSE) with roughly the same population ration is Boston vs. Boston, Lincolnshire. If anything, the English Boston is even more notable vis-à-vis the American one than the Korean suburb is to the Chinese city. —  AjaxSmack  16:13, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anyang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150302053152/http://cdc.cma.gov.cn/home.do to http://cdc.cma.gov.cn/home.do
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921055035/http://old-cdc.cma.gov.cn/shuju/search1.jsp?dsid=SURF_CLI_CHN_MUL_MMON_19712000_CES&tpcat=SURF&type=table&pageid=3 to http://old-cdc.cma.gov.cn/shuju/search1.jsp?dsid=SURF_CLI_CHN_MUL_MMON_19712000_CES&tpcat=SURF&type=table&pageid=3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)