![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Allens, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 4 April 2012. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! |
Apache names
editI would like to see some of the Apache names for this society or position in the band. Is that possible? Thanks And I think it can stand on it's own, it needs a little more work and lots of links to and from other Apache pages. Nice ! --Rcollman 23:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Merge to Apache
editWhy can't this be merged to Apache? Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 21:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
This article should be a part of Apache. It's too short to be out on it's own, and I can't imagine anyone entering the title as it sits. Propose merge to Apache. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dlohcierekim (talk • contribs) 21:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC).
- I guess the automatic link puts the conversation on Talk:Apache. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 21:44, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- I think it would be fine to add to the article and would be an improvement, except for the fact that there are no substantiating references given for the "Traditional Apache Scout"; thus, it is disqualified from being added, or even considered as acceptable Wiki information, unless someone adds appropriate references. Richiar 02:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- On second thought, there are several short "scout" articles. It might make more sense to combine the scout articles into one article. Richiar 04:53, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Do not merge with Apache
editThe apache article is too big already , and can still be enrichened, I thnik the later can be better divided , extending the present one better.
WHAT!?!?! apache should obviously be merged with traditional apache scout bozo33 —Preceding undated comment added 01:11, 13 May 2009 (UTC).
Sources
editCould we get some citations? Cleveriktomi (talk) 19:45, 14 July 2018 (UTC)