Talk:Apeiron

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL One of the difficulties with understanding meanings of statements by Greek philosophers is our ignorance of their technical language. This was based on analogy to material objects and situtions. For example 'water' meant 'gravity'. The word 'apeiron' cannot be understood as 'unlimited', 'infinite' or 'indefinite' because these expressions can be symbolised by (oo), using today's mathematical symblism. The symbol (oo) refers to 'plurality' which is unlimited and undefined. The plurality (oo) is related to dynamism in the form of continuous, quantitative change. This has nothing to do with meaning of Anaximander's statement 'apairon' as the static medium of the beginning(arche). The correct meaning of Apeiron', using todsays symbolism, is Nothingness. In mathematics it is noted as '0'. (89.243.82.96 (talk) 22:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC)) My apology. I forgot to sign the contribution. I am doing it now. KK (83.27.37.136 (talk) 17:49, 9 January 2013 (UTC))

Requested move 12 April 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: pages moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 00:43, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

---

• Apeiron (cosmology) → Apeiron
• Apeiron → Apeiron (disambiguation)

– Clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC with regard to pageviews, historical precedence and significance. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:14, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

• Support. The cosmological concept gets 93 percent of relevant pageviews. Nine Zulu queens (talk) 14:01, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
• Support. Clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.--Cúchullain ^t/c 13:46, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

This article is very poor

It is a mess. Meaningless sentences like “Justice has to destroy everything which is born” are strewn around without context. The article reads like a compilation of various paragraphs copy pasted from various sources without structure.

The English language used is also very poor. 200 year old archaic words like “whence” are used instead of “From where” mixed in with non existent words like “unlimitable”. I assume the writer tried to write “limitless”.

This article needs an overhaul. 85.148.213.144 (talk) 01:35, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

"Apeiron (physics journal)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Apeiron (physics journal) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 14#Apeiron (physics journal) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:03, 14 July 2022 (UTC)