Talk:Aphaena submaculata/GA1

Latest comment: 7 months ago by Wolverine XI in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Etriusus (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Wolverine XI (talk · contribs) 09:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply


Review

edit

Starting review shortly. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 09:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • entomologist Frederick William Hope. Forgot to link "e"
  Done
  • was first scientifically described Does this species have multiple scientific descriptions?
  Done, rrworded
  • Simultaneous => Around the same time or something like that.
  Done
  • the tegmina are a dull red. red what?
  Done
  • Size of Aphaena submaculata burmanica?
  Done
  • Is that you could find on behavior and distribution?
Unfortunately, yes. I've done a handful of planthoppers and they tend to not get much love in source coverage.
  • Traits and evolution of wing venation pattern in paraneopteran insects - a very brief mention regarding vein patterns, I elected not to add this since it would be way to technical/not concise
  • 'From Volume 21'- this is just a repeat of the Fauna of Nepal source, the latter is more direct
  • 'Nomenclatural changes in the suborders Auchenorrhyncha (Hemiptera) and Paleorrhyncha (Palaeohemiptera)' -unable to find a non-pay walled version
  • 'Catalogo das especies americanas de Laternariidae:(Homoptera; Fulgoroidea)' - unable to find any mention of the species, this just seems to be a basic list of nomenclature histories, and an outdated one at that.

Very well prepared article. Had little to complain about and would like to see this article promoted to GA soon. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 09:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Wolverine XI:, that should be everything. Thanks for the review. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 22:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.